Gurukul Nexus Judicial Academy - BNSS Chapter III Notes
Gurukul Nexus Judicial Academy Topper's Revision series Page 1

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA (BNSS), 2023

Chapter III: Power of Courts (Sections 21 to 29)

I. Introduction & Context

Chapter III acts as the "Power Matrix" of the Indian criminal justice system. It establishes the legal boundaries (jurisdictional competence) and determines exactly which court can try an offence, alongside the maximum punishment—imprisonment, fines, or community service—a judge can legally hand down.

Section 21: Courts by which Offences are Triable

This section acts as the primary gatekeeper for criminal trial venue distribution.

1. Offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Any offence mentioned in the BNS, 2023 can be tried by:

  • The High Court
  • The Court of Session
  • Any other Court specifically shown in the First Schedule of the BNSS as having powers to try that particular offence.
💡 CRITICAL PROVISO: Crimes Against Women
Under BNS Sections 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, or 71 (offences related to rape and sexual assault), the trial MUST, as far as practicable, be conducted by a Court presided over by a woman Judge.

2. Offences under Other Laws (Special & Local Laws)

For crimes defined under specialized legislations (e.g., POCSO, NDPS, Arms Act):

  • If the special law specifies a court, then that designated court must conduct the trial.
  • If no court is specified, it may be tried by the High Court or any other court specified in the First Schedule of the BNSS.

Section 22: Sentences which High Courts & Sessions Judges may pass

This defines the absolute ceiling of powers for the superior judiciary tiers.

  • High Court: Can pass any sentence authorized by law. This includes life imprisonment and the death penalty.
  • Sessions Judge & Additional Sessions Judge: Can pass any sentence authorized by law.
🚨 The Death Sentence Rule

When a Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge passes a death sentence, the sentence is NOT executed immediately. It is strictly subject to mandatory confirmation by the High Court under Chapter XXX (Section 407 of BNSS). It remains inoperative until confirmed.

Hierarchical Flow of Superior Court Sentencing
High Court
Any Legal Sentence
Sessions Court
Any Sentence*

*Note: Death penalty issued by Sessions Court requires mandatory confirmation by HC.

Gurukul Nexus Judicial Academy Topper's Revision series Page 2

Section 23: Sentences which Magistrates may pass

This section lays down the strict power-hierarchy for the subordinate judiciary. A fundamental change introduced by the BNSS is the legislative introduction of "Community Service".

Designation of Judge Max. Imprisonment Limit Max. Fine Limit Additional Power (BNSS Change)
Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) Up to 7 Years Unlimited (Any fine authorized by law) None (Retained from CrPC)
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (JMFC) Up to 3 Years Up to ₹50,000 Community Service
Judicial Magistrate 2nd Class (JMSC) Up to 1 Year Up to ₹10,000 Community Service
💡 What is Community Service?
Under Section 23, both JMFCs and JMSCs can award Community Service to encourage reformative justice. It acts as an alternative, non-custodial punishment for petty crimes to decongest prisons.

Section 24: Imprisonment in Default of Fine

If a convict fails or refuses to pay the fine ordered by the court, the law provides for an alternative sentence of imprisonment in default.

🧮 THE 1/4th "GOLDEN" FORMULA (Section 24 Limit)
The period of default imprisonment awarded by a Magistrate must NOT exceed:
¼th (25%) of the maximum term of imprisonment which the Magistrate is competent to inflict for a single offence under Section 23.

Mathematical Core Rules:

  • Rule 1: It must not exceed the maximum limits of the specific Magistrate's statutory powers (e.g., a JMFC cannot award more than 9 months in default).
  • Rule 2: This default term is in addition to any substantive sentence awarded for the crime.
✍️ Numerical Example to Avoid Common Exam Mistakes

Assume a person is convicted for theft by a Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC).
• The JMFC's maximum general imprisonment competency under Sec 23 is 3 Years (36 Months).
• The max default sentence that this JMFC can ever award:
36 Months × ¼ = 9 Months maximum.
*Note: Even if the substantive penal law prescribes a longer term, the JMFC's default imprisonment limit is strictly capped by their personal competency threshold!

Gurukul Nexus Judicial Academy Topper's Revision series Page 3

Section 25: Sentences in Cases of Conviction of Several Offences at One Trial

When a single trial convicts a person for multiple distinct offences, the court has the authority to award separate punishments for each.

1. Concurrent vs. Consecutive

Unless the court directs that these sentences shall run concurrently (at the same time), they will run consecutively (one after another).

2. The Two Golden Consecutive Caps (Formulas)

When consecutive sentences are ordered, the trial court does not need to send the trial to a higher court simply because the sum of punishments exceeds its normal jurisdictional limits. However, the total cumulative sentence is subject to two absolute statutory ceilings:

⚠️ THE CONSECUTIVE CEILING LIMITS
1. The 14-Year Absolute Cap: The aggregate consecutive sentence must never exceed 14 years.
2. The 2x Base Limit Rule: The aggregate sentence must never exceed twice (2x) the sentencing power of that specific Magistrate for a single offence.

Example: A JMFC (max power 3 years) convicts an offender for three offences at one trial. The absolute maximum consecutive sentence the JMFC can issue is 6 years (3 years × 2), and NOT 9 years.

3. Appeal Calculation

For the purposes of determining the forum of appeal, the aggregate of consecutive sentences passed against a convict shall be treated as a single sentence.

Sections 26 to 29: Administrative Modalities

  • Section 26 (Mode of conferring powers): The High Court or State Government may confer powers on persons by name, by virtue of their office, or by official titles. Powers take effect from the date of communication.
  • Section 27 (Powers of officers appointed): When an officer invested with magisterial powers is transferred or appointed to an equivalent/higher office in the same local jurisdiction, they retain and carry their powers unless directed otherwise.
  • Section 28 (Withdrawal of powers): Powers may be revoked.
    ☞ High Court or State Govt can withdraw powers they conferred.
    ☞ The CJM or District Magistrate can withdraw powers they conferred on subordinates.
  • Section 29 (Successors-in-office): Powers/duties of a Judge or Magistrate devolve onto their official successor.
    *Dispute Resolution: In case of doubt, the Sessions Judge decides the successor for Judicial/Additional Sessions Judges or Magistrates. The District Magistrate (DM) decides for Executive Magistrates.
Gurukul Nexus Judicial Academy Topper's Revision series Page 4

⚖️ CRITICAL JURAL SHIFT: BNSS (2023) vs. CrPC (1973)

Analyzing these shifts is highly critical for Mains exams. The primary legislative intent behind BNSS is modernization, uniform judicial application, and prison reform.

Feature / Concept Old CrPC (1973) New BNSS (2023) Mains / Legislative Rationale
Metropolitan Magistrates (MM) Existed (CrPC Sec 29(4)) Completely Abolished Uniformity: Eliminates colonial distinctions between metropolitan (mega-cities) and rural areas. A JMFC is uniform.
Assistant Sessions Judges Existed (Capped at 10 yrs) Completely Abolished Streamlining: Cuts down on administrative clutter. Now it's strictly Sessions and Addl. Sessions.
Fine Limit for JMFC Capped at ₹10,000 Increased to ₹50,000 Inflation Adjustment: Escalates deterrence to align with modern economic reality.
Fine Limit for JMSC Capped at ₹5,000 Increased to ₹10,000 Same as above.
Community Service No formal codification Added to Sec 23 Restorative Justice: Introduces reformative correction for petty offenders, reducing prison overcrowding.
Juvenile Jurisdiction Section 27 existed Omitted De-duplication: Handled comprehensively by the special Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act, 2015.
🧠 HIGH-RETENTION MNEMONICS

1. Sentencing Hierarchy (Sec 23): "High-Seven-Three-One"
• High Court/Sessions = Unlimited.
• Seven Years = CJM.
• Three Years = JMFC.
• One Year = JMSC.
2. Fine Thresholds: "Fifty-Ten Rule" (JMFC = 50k, JMSC = 10k).
3. Multiple Crimes (Sec 25 Limit): "14 or Double (2x)".
4. Default Imprisonment (Sec 24): "Quarter of the Core" (Max 1/4th of Magistrate's personal base limits).

Gurukul Nexus Judicial Academy Self-Assessment Portal Page 5

🎯 Gurukul Knowledge-Check (Self-Test Quiz)

1. Under Section 23 of the BNSS, 2023, what is the maximum fine that a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class (JMFC) can impose?

A) ₹10,000
B) ₹25,000
C) ₹50,000
D) Unlimited fine
View Answer & Explanation
Correct Answer: C (₹50,000)
Under BNSS Sec 23(2), the fine limit of JMFC is increased to ₹50,000 from the legacy CrPC limit of ₹10,000.

2. Which of the following judicial offices has been completely abolished in the BNSS, 2023?

A) Additional Sessions Judge
B) Metropolitan Magistrate & Assistant Sessions Judge
C) Chief Judicial Magistrate
D) Judicial Magistrate Second Class
View Answer & Explanation
Correct Answer: B (Metropolitan Magistrate & Assistant Sessions Judge)
Both of these categories have been removed in the 2023 Sanhita to streamline hierarchy and establish country-wide uniformity.

3. When a consecutive sentence is ordered in a single trial for multiple offences, what is the absolute statutory cap for the aggregate period under Section 25?

A) 10 Years
B) 14 Years
C) 20 Years
D) Life Imprisonment
View Answer & Explanation
Correct Answer: B (14 Years)
Section 25(2) of the BNSS states that the total aggregate period of consecutive sentences cannot exceed 14 years.

4. If there is a dispute regarding who is the successor-in-office of an Executive Magistrate, who resolves it under Section 29?

A) The Sessions Judge
B) The High Court
C) The District Magistrate (DM)
D) The State Government
View Answer & Explanation
Correct Answer: C (The District Magistrate)
Section 29(3) clarifies that the DM resolves doubts regarding the successor of Executive Magistrates, whereas the Sessions Judge handles Judicial/Sessions counterparts.

5. Under Section 24, what is the maximum default sentence in case of non-payment of fine a JMSC can pass?

A) 6 Months
B) 3 Months
C) 1 Month
D) 1 Year
View Answer & Explanation
Correct Answer: B (3 Months)
A JMSC's maximum substantive power is 1 Year (12 months). Under the 1/4th rule: 12 months / 4 = 3 months.

📝 Mains Analytical Focus (Short Questions)

Q1. Discuss the legislative significance of introducing "Community Service" as a form of sentence under the BNSS.

View Model Outline
Core Points:
1. Shifts penal philosophy from purely retributive to reformative.
2. Decreases overcrowding in prisons by diverting petty convicts.
3. Cuts public expenses related to prisoner maintenance.
4. Empowers lower judiciary (JMFC & JMSC) directly to prescribe alternative corrections.

Q2. Calculate the maximum sentence in default of fine a JMFC can award for an offence of simple hurt which carries a maximum statutory penalty of 1 year.

View Model Outline
Legal Analysis:
Under Section 24, the default cap is 1/4th of the Magistrate's core jurisdictional sentencing power (which is 3 years / 36 months for a JMFC), NOT 1/4th of the offence penalty.
• Max JMFC Power = 36 Months.
• 1/4th of 36 Months = 9 Months maximum.
Thus, the default sentence is valid up to 9 months, despite the offence carrying a maximum penalty of only 1 year.