GURUKUL NEXUS JUDICIAL ACADEMY
Topper's Personal Handwriting Bundle
Page 1 / 5
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
Master Study Guide: Sections 379 to 385 (Corresponding to CrPC Sec 340-346)
I. Thematic Overview of Chapter XXVIII
"Chapter XXVIII serves as the Court's Immune System." Jurisprudentially, the complete administration of justice depends on truth, order, and courtroom decorum. If litigants can freely submit forged evidence (perjury) or disrupt proceedings, judicial authority crumbles.
Under standard criminal law, any citizen can initiate action by filing an FIR. However, for offences affecting the administration of justice, only the Court itself can initiate prosecution. This checks malicious private litigation trying to use perjury claims as harassment tactics in civil/criminal cases.
Structural Split of Sections 379–385 (Pencil Blueprint)
THE PERJURY & FORGERY ROUTE
- Sec 379: The Preliminary Inquiry Protocol
- Sec 380: Appellate Mechanics
- Sec 381: Deterrent Costs (Frivolous Filter)
- Sec 382: Cognizance Protocol by Magistrate
- Sec 383: Summary Trial for blatant Perjury
THE COURTROOM DISRUPTION ROUTE
- Sec 384: Immediate Contempt Proceeding
- Sec 385: Referral Protocol when Contempt is too severe to handle locally
GURUKUL NEXUS JUDICIAL ACADEMY
Topper's Personal Handwriting Bundle
Page 2 / 5
II. BNSS Section 379: Procedure (The Primary Trial Route)
(Corresponds to Section 340 CrPC)
When a Court is of opinion that "it is expedient in the interests of justice" that an inquiry should be made into any offense mentioned in Section 215(1)(b) BNSS (lying under oath or submitting forged documents in court proceedings), the following procedure is mandatory:
1. Preliminary Inquiry: The Court *may* choose to hold a preliminary inquiry to establish *prima facie* proof of forgery or perjury.
2. Recording the Finding: The Court *shall* record a finding that a prima facie case exists.
3. Write Complaint & Forward: The Court *shall* make a written complaint and sign it, sending it to a Magistrate of the First Class (JM1) having jurisdiction.
4. Securing Custody/Bail: To ensure the offender doesn't escape, the court can demand security/bond or direct them directly in custody to the receiving JM1.
III. BNSS Section 380: Appeal Mechanics
(Corresponds to Section 341 CrPC)
Because judges can make errors (either through bias, errors of fact, or malicious refusal), Section 380 provides a remedy for both sides:
- The person against whom a Section 379 complaint was filed.
- The person whose application to file a Sec 379 complaint was refused.
Appeals go to the Superior Court to which the complaining court is subordinate.
The Superior Court can either:
- Withdraw the complaint.
- Or create the complaint itself if refused.
Appellate Hierarchy Flow Diagram (Pencil Style)
GURUKUL NEXUS JUDICIAL ACADEMY
Topper's Personal Handwriting Bundle
Page 3 / 5
IV. BNSS Section 381: Power to Order Costs
(Corresponds to Section 342 CrPC)
Litigants often try to harass their opponents by filing malicious, frivolous applications for perjury to delay trials. To counter this, Section 381 empowers any court dealing with an application under Sec 379 or appeal under Sec 380 to order "such costs as may be just."
💡 Example: Party A files a baseless application accusing Party B of submitting forged bank receipts. The judge finds it is an extortion tactic to stall negotiations. The judge dismisses it with exemplary costs ordered against Party A.
V. BNSS Section 382: Magistrate Taking Cognizance
(Corresponds to Section 343 CrPC)
When the written complaint made under Section 379 reaches the receiving Magistrate, they must execute trials under these specific instructions:
The Magistrate must proceed "as if it were instituted on a police report". This is a brilliant legislative fast-track! It bypasses standard private complaint procedures.
Normally, a Magistrate must examine a private complainant under oath. But since the "complainant" here is a sitting judicial officer (Judge) who drafted the Section 379 complaint, no personal examination of the judge is needed. They skip straight to trial processing!
If the original judicial proceedings (where the forgery/perjury occurred) are currently pending appeal, the Magistrate trying the perjury case may adjourn the trial until that original appeal is resolved.
🎯 MAINS EXAM BOOSTER KEY NOTE:
Why the Police Report treatment? Under normal private complaints, trials are slower due to pre-summoning evidence stages. Treating this as a police-report case allows the court to instantly frame charges and conduct a speedy trial, preserving the public interest in prosecuting perjury.
GURUKUL NEXUS JUDICIAL ACADEMY
Topper's Personal Handwriting Bundle
Page 4 / 5
VI. BNSS Section 383: Summary Perjury Trial (Rapid-Fire Route)
(Corresponds to Section 344 CrPC)
While Section 379 is the *standard slow* route (sending complaints to another court), Section 383 provides a rapid-fire, summary procedure for blatant, undeniable perjury.
- Who can invoke? Only a Court of Session or Magistrate of the First Class (JM1).
- The Timing Trigger: At the exact time of delivery of any judgment or final order.
- The Requirement: Court must form an opinion that a witness has "knowingly or willfully" given false evidence.
- Natural Justice Guard: Must issue a Show Cause Notice to the witness before sentencing.
- Punishment Limit: Max 3 Months imprisonment, or fine, or both.
VII. BNSS Section 384: Procedure in Cases of Direct Contempt
(Corresponds to Section 345 CrPC)
This section addresses "Contempt in the Face of the Court". If a person actively disrupts the courtroom (e.g., throwing slippers, screaming, refusing to take an oath), the court can respond instantly.
GURUKUL NEXUS JUDICIAL ACADEMY
Topper's Personal Handwriting Bundle
Page 5 / 5
VIII. BNSS Section 385: Transfer Protocol (The Escape Valve)
(Corresponds to Section 346 CrPC)
What if a courtroom disruptor throws a physical object at the judge or threatens violence? A Rs. 200 fine (under Section 384) is completely inadequate. However, the insulted Judge cannot sentence them to a heavy jail term themselves due to the core natural justice maxim: "Nemo Judex In Causa Sua" (No one should be a judge in their own cause)
- The Trigger: If the court considers the offense deserves punishment beyond a Rs. 200 fine or direct prison time.
- The Protocol: The court records the facts of the insult and the statement of the accused, then forwards the case to a Magistrate having jurisdiction to hold a proper neutral trial.
- Custody: The court can send the offender in custody or demand security for appearance before that Magistrate.
"Perjury Appeals Cost Magistrates Summary Contempt Transfers"
Procedure (379)
Appeal (380)
Costs (381)
Magistrate (382)
Summary (383)
Contempt (384)
Transfer (385)
📝 Live Self-Test Quiz (Click to Reveal Answers)
Q1. When a Judge files a complaint under Sec 379 BNSS, how must the receiving Magistrate treat it?
Answer: As if it were instituted on a POLICE REPORT (Section 382 BNSS). Bypasses personal examination of the complaining judge.
Q2. What is the maximum sentence a Court of Session can pass under the summary perjury trial of Sec 383?
Answer: Maximum 3 Months imprisonment, or fine, or both.
Q3. What jurisprudential doctrine dictates the transfer under Section 385?
Answer: "Nemo Judex In Causa Sua" (No one should be a judge in their own cause) to avoid judicial bias when court contempt exceeds standard fine limits.